Independence Institute

Property Rights Project


0 Comments

February 10th, 2009

A fascinating feature on the Pinon Canyon land debate

Behind all of the passion surrounding the military’s efforts to expand its Pinon Canyon training grounds in southern Colorado, this article stands out as a thoughtful, articulate explanation of what’s going on.  Here is an exerpt from a report by Trey Garrison in a recent edition of The Land Report.

“[Mack Louden] thinks one of the biggest problems expansion opponents face is that the opinion makers and major media types in Washington and New York can’t fathom the scale of acreage under discussion.

‘For someone who pays $1 million for a 1,000-square-foot apartment or a quarter-acre lot, they think 100,000 acres is all the land in the world. Why not give up a little?’ Louden says.

But in this part of the country a rancher needs up to 100 acres to support a single cow-calf pair. In the warmer months herds are fed grain. During the harsh winters they survive on protein-rich native grasses. Louden, whose own 30,000-acre ranch supports just 300 Red Angus, says that when all is said and done a rancher with his size operation is lucky to net $35,000 a year. Most ranchers and their wives work extra jobs to make ends meet or to get health insurance coverage.

Louden and I are driving down a dirt road that runs between along the fence line of the existing PCMS. Kennie Gyurman, who lost his ranch in the first PCMS back in 1983 and is still mad about that 25 years later, has joined us. Gyurman’s beat-up Ropers, faded Wranglers, and angry disposition come across anti-military, but once upon a time he worked for the Department of Defense just outside Denver.

‘You can’t trust a thing they tell you,’ Gyurman says. ‘They’ll say they want one thing and take another. They’ll say they just want this much, and then they’ll take everything. We have to stop them.’

Opponents of the expansion such as these two aren’t worried about their land. Gyurman’s already lost his, and Louden’s ranch isn’t even in the Army’s sites. Their position is as much philosophical as it is self-interest.

As Lon Robertson told me last year, ‘They say they need the land to help train our soldiers to fight for our rights. I thought one of our rights was the right to own property.’”

Click here to see the full article.


0 Comments

February 6th, 2009

Commerce City business owners continue fight against annexation

From Les Burch of the Commerce City Tea Party:

“Can you afford not to fight Commerce City taxes?
 
Did you know that following the forced annexation of your business property, the average company will be paying approximately $15k in additional Commerce City taxes every year?
 
We invite you to visit The Commerce City Tea Party’s website at www.commercecityteaparty.org to view a tax estimator that allows you to calculate for yourself how much the new tax burdens will cost your business*. After you do the math, ask yourself, how does $15,000, $30,000, or $50,000 or more in additional annual taxes compare to a one-time financial contribution to help us fight to reverse the annexation decision, and, free you from taxation without representation?  Read the rest of this entry »


0 Comments

February 5th, 2009

Eminent Domain gets tricky at state Capitol

While it’s frequently easy to see the good guys and bad guys in an eminent domain case, what happens when a private entity is forced into relocating in a way that could require eminent domain?

See the latest on what’s going on at the Capitol about a proposal to move Colorado’s front range railroads further east.

“In Tuesday’s Senate Transportation Committee meeting senators voted 4-3 to indefinitely postpone a bill that would have prevented railroad companies from exercising their right to use eminent domain. The bill was in response to CDOT’s forthcoming proposal to relocate freight rail away from the Front Range and to eastern Colorado in order to facilitate the implementation of passenger rail systems in the metro area. Trapped in the middle of this legislation were railroad companies, who expressed little desire to relocate or use eminent domain.”


0 Comments

February 4th, 2009

PRP Director Jessica Corry appears on KBDI’s Independent Thinking to talk about property rights

View U Tube video here of Friday’s “Independent Thinking” (KBDI/12 Denver).  PRP Director Jessica Peck Corry, together with state Rep. Cory Gardner, R-Yuma, discusses a variety of hotbutton issues, including property rights and transporation funding.


0 Comments

February 3rd, 2009

Timing gets worse for RTD

Facing growing discontent from area mayors and property owners, news that RTD will need to acquire more than 100 full or partial properties to complete its DIA line couldn’t come at a worse time for the transit authority.  While many FasTracks backers are banking of federal stimulus dollars backfilling RTD’s $2 billion funding hole, the funds could only solve part of the problems RTD faces.

As Face The State reports today:

“The public relations battle only continues to intensify as a coalition of metro mayors asks questions about RTD’s proposed cuts amid funding shortfall. Meanwhile, area land use attorneys, including Denver lawyer Bob Hoban, speculate that RTD’s woes will mean that those receiving condemnation notices must be extra vigilant to make sure their rights, including their right to just compensation, are properly observed.

“Even liberal Denver Post columnist Susan Barnes-Gelt has jumped on the bandwagon questioning RTD, calling for a change in management. ‘General Manager Cal Marsella has been at the helm of the organization for nearly two decades. His energetic optimism and pleasing personality were important ingredients in advancing the region to this point. However, just as a 21st century governance structure is called for, so too is a change of leadership,’ she wrote last week.

“When it comes to the DIA line, many are left second-guessing whether it was such a good idea to put a major airport in the middle of nowhere. As Face The State reported in August, 25 miles extend between downtown Denver and DIA. ‘Today, DIA is further from a city enter than any other U.S. airport currently serving a major metropolitan area. Only Dulles International Airport, outside of Washington, D.C., presents travelers with a longer commute. But for that region’s visitors and residents also have an option in Reagan National, an airport located just a few miles from the Capitol in Arlington, Virginia.’”


0 Comments

February 2nd, 2009

RTD seeks more than 100 partial or total properties for DIA line

As The Denver Post reports today, RTD will seek more than 110 properties, 44 of them full and the remainder partial.  To view the draft study and get information on this specific line, property owners can visit www.eastcorridor.com.


0 Comments

January 30th, 2009

FTS: Lakewood Eminent Domain Meeting Gets Heated

According to Face The State, a January 17th Lakewood meeting designed to discuss RTD’s westward light rail expansion became heated when residents began asking an RTD attorney specific questions about how their property values would be determined.

As Face The State reports:

Leading the meeting was Lakewood City Councilwoman Vicki Stack and fellow Republican, state Rep. Jim Kerr of Littleton. While the meeting was organized specifically to give Kerr an opportunity to explain 2005 legislation that created a controversial compensation formula in partial takings cases, property owners quickly pounced on the opportunity to ask specific questions and voice frustrations to RTD attorney Marla Lien.

“My home is my castle,” property owner Jan Mullen told Lien. “It may not be a big castle, but it’s my castle.”

Read the full story by clicking here.


0 Comments

December 10th, 2008

Property Rights Coalition emerges to educate people about rail relocation

Eastern Colorado farmers are gearing up for another property rights battle.

From www.CoCarr.com:

“Citizens Against Railroad Relocation (CARR) was created during the summer of 2008 after a group of Eastern Colorado Citizens became aware of the Railroad Relocation Project.  We are committed to informing our membership and the general public about the proposed railroad relocation through Eastern Colorado.  Our goal is to preserve the quality of our farms and ranches, our communities, natural resources, wildlife, land and way of life for future generations by protecting private property rights.  Our coalition has been formed to oppose a plan to relocate coal trains through eastern Colorado.  Read the rest of this entry »


0 Comments

December 3rd, 2008

Have your voice heard on light rail

From Tom Wambolt of the Colorado Property Rights Coalitoin:

Greetings:
The City of Thornton will be hosting an open forum that will seek input from citizens about the cities’ options on light rail. The CPRC has been invited to attend and provide input also.

PUBLIC MEETING: 9500 Civic Center Dr., Thornton, CO

Thursday Dec. 11, 2008 6-9 P.M.


0 Comments

December 3rd, 2008

Denver silent auction for property rights includes top western artists

From Lon Robinson in Kim, Colo.–Works by some of the best Artists in the western United States are on
exhibit and for sale this week at the Standing Sun Gallery in Denver.  Read the rest of this entry »


Who We Are

The Independence Institute's Property Rights Project was established in 2005 to serve as a community resource on land use issues—including but not limited to—eminent domain abuse, zoning regulations, and historical designations. (Read More)

Stay Connected

Stay up to date with the latest from the Property Rights Project by subscribing to our RSS feed.